<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pepsi&#8217;s Logo and Obama&#8217;s Logo &#8211; Coincidence?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.christianandamerican.com/pepsis-logo-and-obamas-logo-coincidence.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.christianandamerican.com/pepsis-logo-and-obamas-logo-coincidence.html</link>
	<description>Bringing culture to the font of regeneration</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 21:08:23 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.christianandamerican.com/pepsis-logo-and-obamas-logo-coincidence.html/comment-page-1#comment-627</link>
		<dc:creator>aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christianandamerican.com/?p=793#comment-627</guid>
		<description>taylor your just seeing things</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>taylor your just seeing things</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.christianandamerican.com/pepsis-logo-and-obamas-logo-coincidence.html/comment-page-1#comment-563</link>
		<dc:creator>thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 10:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christianandamerican.com/?p=793#comment-563</guid>
		<description>They love obama&#039;s communist man love. America is dieing - no thanks to pepsi and all the other corporate sell outs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They love obama&#8217;s communist man love. America is dieing &#8211; no thanks to pepsi and all the other corporate sell outs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrDarryl</title>
		<link>http://www.christianandamerican.com/pepsis-logo-and-obamas-logo-coincidence.html/comment-page-1#comment-362</link>
		<dc:creator>FrDarryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 16:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christianandamerican.com/?p=793#comment-362</guid>
		<description>Now see, there you go again, trying to find connections, phenomenological family resemblances so you can violate every Kantian principle we&#039;re all categorically compelled to accept.

Every logo is a sui generis. Didn&#039;t you learn anything about about the ultimacy of epistemic atomism from your study of Kant, or even Occam? Everything stands on its own. So everyone defines his or her own truth, hence, all truth is &#039;pluriform&#039; truth. There are no categories, no metanarratives.

And no labels!

Take Indabas for instance.  To make it work, you must suspend all judgement and enter every discussion as a tabula rasa. No epistemic commitments, just an opinion. No episteme, just doxa. Then every participant presents his or her doxa with the full intention of listening to the doxa of everyone else. They leave having heard many wonderful opinions, yet amazingly unchanged, but most importantly: still uncommitted!

Even Thomas taught the intellectual virtue of docility, teachableness. Of course he tempered it with tenacity to revealed, sacred doctrine. But that was before Occam has his way with the world.

It worked at Lambeth! Did you not learn even from them?

Oh, sorry. I forgot you traded up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now see, there you go again, trying to find connections, phenomenological family resemblances so you can violate every Kantian principle we&#8217;re all categorically compelled to accept.</p>
<p>Every logo is a sui generis. Didn&#8217;t you learn anything about about the ultimacy of epistemic atomism from your study of Kant, or even Occam? Everything stands on its own. So everyone defines his or her own truth, hence, all truth is &#8216;pluriform&#8217; truth. There are no categories, no metanarratives.</p>
<p>And no labels!</p>
<p>Take Indabas for instance.  To make it work, you must suspend all judgement and enter every discussion as a tabula rasa. No epistemic commitments, just an opinion. No episteme, just doxa. Then every participant presents his or her doxa with the full intention of listening to the doxa of everyone else. They leave having heard many wonderful opinions, yet amazingly unchanged, but most importantly: still uncommitted!</p>
<p>Even Thomas taught the intellectual virtue of docility, teachableness. Of course he tempered it with tenacity to revealed, sacred doctrine. But that was before Occam has his way with the world.</p>
<p>It worked at Lambeth! Did you not learn even from them?</p>
<p>Oh, sorry. I forgot you traded up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

