Military Chaplains…Church and State

November 10, 2008 by Eric James Wilson  
Filed under Faith, Headlines, Politics

Tuesday’s celebration of Veterans’ Day has gotten me thinking about military chaplains. I have a family member serving on active duty in the Armed Forces in Iraq and he has told stories of the comfort and guidance provided by his unit’s chaplain. I am also uplifted by stories of brave military chaplains, like Fr. Vincent Capodanno, who have given their lives to minister to men and women serving in harm’s way.

Not everyone, however, is impressed by the service of these military chaplains. Christopher Hitchens, a writer, intellectual, and fellow Washingtonian, whom I admire greatly is perhaps the most vocal critic of our nation’s military chaplaincies. In a 2006 article in Slate he writes, “why are there official chaplains in the armed forces at all? Is not their very presence, paid for out of the public treasury, an affront to the establishment clause of the all-important First Amendment? The author of that amendment, James Madison, certainly thought so.”

As a Catholic, I like the fact that my coreligionists are able to worship as they serve our country around the world, often away from their families. However, I admit to being uncomfortable at the prospect of spending tax dollars to fund Muslim chaplains to conduct sexually segregated services – an example raised by Hitchens.

In fact, a 1986 court case (Katcoff v. Marsh) challenged the constitutionality of military chaplains, but the court found that it was within the armed forces mission to employ religious leaders. Indeed, the provision of military chaplains is critical in allowing men and women serving in the armed forces the ability to freely practice their religion.

Writing in the University of Toledo Law Review Richard Rosen summarizes the court’s finding: “Recognizing the inherent tension between the Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses, the Second Circuit found that if Congress did not establish an Army chaplaincy, it would deny soldiers the right to exercise their religion freely, particularly given the mobile and deployable nature of the nation’s armed forces.”

So, as we remember the brave men and women who have fought for our country, let us also remember the men who have served them as chaplains, following them around the world, through artillery fire and machine gun volleys and roadside bombs. I hope we are always willing to ensure that those who fight for our freedoms are able to exercise theirs.

[Post to Twitter]  [Post to Plurk]  [Post to Yahoo Buzz]  [Post to Delicious]  [Post to Digg]  [Post to Facebook]  [Post to Reddit]  [Post to StumbleUpon] 

Comments

2 Responses to “Military Chaplains…Church and State”

  1. S. Murphy on November 21st, 2008 1:10 am

    I’m Catholic, too, and grateful for our chaplains. But we have our quirky rules – an all-male priesthood, eg.: why should we be bothered if Muslims have sex-segregated services? Why should an atheist be bothered by how any religion organizes its worship? It’s entirely their business; and I want my comrades in arms to have the comfort of their faith in any clime and place.

    As for Hitchens – if he wants us to defend his freedom, he can by God pony up for our chaplains. Ask a man to put his ass on the line, and then tell him it would be unconstitutional to have someone there to administer the last sacraments, when said ass gets shot off? That’s like not wanting to pay for MREs, or for fuel for the humvees. It’s an operating cost. Accept it.

    Chaplains also provide a safety valve, irrespective of denomination – someone who is part of the military and understands how it works, to whom any member of the unit can talk about anything. They’re the second line of counseling, if someone can’t talk to his friends. They let people vent, and help them get their heads back in the game. Most of them do so in a highly professional manner, without attempting to force religious instruction or invitations to conversion on those who don’t want such instruction. They provide services and Sacraments for their own faith-community, and information for others about schedules and points of contact; but they *listen* to anybody who needs an ear. Those of them that fail to do so should receive crappy evals and be invited to resign; but most of them respect boundaries, and the exceptions should not be the basis for policy decisions.

    Semper Fi!

  2. Taylor Marshall on November 22nd, 2008 3:51 pm

    A man is more courageous in battle if he has just received the sacraments.

Feel free to leave a comment...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!